There are several ways of presenting information on websites, namely in the form of:
- Global navigation
- Local navigation
- ‘Mega menus’
- Contextual menus
- Visuals and images
- Configurators
- Personalised navigation
- Social navigation
- ‘Fat footers’
- Supplemental navigation
Using the financial websites explored in recent posts (see here and here) and some additional sites, I found examples of each on several different financial sites.
Global navigation
Global navigation refers to finding the site’s location on the internet as a whole and recognising which site you are on. Most sites accomplish this by simply using branding in the form of colours and their logo at the top of the page which of course informs the user whose site their on.
On a more local scale, ‘global navigation’ could also refer to where the user is in on the site on an ‘over-arching level’. Most financial websites for example have different pages or indeed entire sites for personal and business users – or perhaps a site is available in multiple languages. This could also be classed as ‘global navigation’.





Many banks and financial agencies offer different services for different kinds of user, so it make sense to split their sites down initially into the user types and then into the types of services that is provided for each user group – this is where local navigation comes in.
Local navigation
Local navigation on financial sites at least is the categorisation of services offered to the different user types. Often once the user has selected a sub-site to visit (on financial sites, usually based on their usage type), they are then presented with services available for that particular group in the form of a classic menu bar across the top of the page. The screenshot of QuickQuid above is an example, more are below:



Like the global navigation, local navigation is designed to help filter down information and make finding pages easier for the user. If a user is not interested in business options then don’t show it to them – that’s the effect that these types of navigation systems have on the user’s experience.
‘Mega menus’
A fairly recent design practice, the ‘mega menu’ theoretically replaces the traditional ‘drop down/slide out’ menu with one large drop-down menu which features a lot of links, typically categorised and arranged in some kind of order or hierarchy to help make finding pages and information faster for the user.




Contextual menus
By using a small amount of descriptive text and imagery, menus can be made easier to understand. Text and images can be used to indicate what a page contains without the user having to actually visit the page. This helps the user make an informed choice about the pages they visit and saves them from wasting time.



Contextual menus can reside inside of a mega menu, but generally seem to be placed at the bottom of a page or in the middle of it. Their aim seems to be to remind users to look at other pages whilst they are scrolling down the home page, pointing users to information that may not be available on the home page. However, there was one exception.

HSBC uses a contextual menu at the top of their page. It works well but the reason this isn’t more common is likely that it requires more space and the context copy has to be very short for it to work.
Visuals
Visuals can be incorporated into any of the above to help make menu labels easier to understand, look at the contextual menus above for example – each one has a little image on it to help represent what is in the menu and this helps the user to make a decision about whether or not that is the page they need to look at.
Using Virgin Money as an example again, below is a screenshot of their menu with icons.

The icons also give a friendly and approachable feel to the site. A lot of these financial businesses are seen as being very corporate, unapproachable and often a bit scheming. The icons and flat colours help to give a more approachable, yet still professional, feel.
Configurators
Technically a type of search refinement – and a very specific one at that, configurators, like mega menus and the different navigation structures, help to make finding extremely specific information easy to find. The best example of configurators tend to reside on websites where the user can purchase a highly customisable product such as a car or a computer. On financial websites, the best examples are typically to be found in insurance finders.


There tends not to be many variations of this on insurance websites. Typically, they are forms that the user completes with information about their car and driving history and after all of the relevant information has been entered, a search algorithm finds the best insurance policy. This is different to configurators on other sites where a user can typically select size, colour and other options of a product and see a visual representation of what it will look like and also see the cost, but it is the closest thing that the financial sector offers.
Personalised navigation
Personalised navigation is navigation that adapts and responds to a user’s specific needs. The most common example is on e-Commerce websites where users are offered products to purchase based on purchase history, browsing history and what others who have bought similar products to you bought. On financial sites, personalised navigation is not as common – the closest thing to it I’ve seen on the example sites I’m using is Barclays’ search suggestions which suggests thing to search for based on what other customers have searched for.

A lot of these sites are collecting cookies, so it is likely there is some level of personalised data being collected, however it is likely things such as location data to bring regional pages to the user.
Social navigation
This type of navigation is also based on popular items, but this time is linked more to ‘what’s trending’ or ‘which articles/videos/pictures are viewed the most’. The results tend to change rapidly. The aim is to push the latest and most viral content and as the name suggests, it tends to be used on social media. The example above is almost a good example of it, since the most popular search terms are shown, but otherwise there aren’t any examples on any of the other sites.
‘Fat footers’
Traditionally a footer just contained copyright information, perhaps some contact information and maybe a link to social media or legal information such as terms and conditions. On many larger sites now, footers are increasingly becoming like a static ‘mega menu’, permanently fixed to the bottom of the site. This means that footers are slowly becoming a second form of navigation, the idea perhaps being that if the user scrolls to the bottom of a page they are able to continue navigating around the site without having to scroll back to the top of the site to use the navigation links at the top of the page.




Interestingly, these ‘fat footers’ tend to be grey or black on financial websites – most of the body colour is white so the grey and black looks more distinct against the white body colour and thus draws the user to the footer more so than if it were also white. These sites need to look professional and trustworthy too, which the use of grey or black assists with.
As can be seen, a ‘fat footer’ isn’t always about pushing links, rather just for displaying information in a more obvious manner than perhaps placing it in a smaller, more traditional footer would have been.
Supplementary navigation
Other ways of navigating a site, typically an index page with links to pages arranged by category or alphabetically. On financial websites, a page like this is typically called the ‘site map’, not to be confused with sitemap.xml, which is typically the name of a file used by search engine crawlers to index the individual pages on a website.




These site maps are not generally obviously accessible from the home pages or other pages on the websites, but can be found easily via a Google Search. These are really the only thing financial websites use for navigation besides the menus. The ‘fat footer’ and ‘mega menu’ almost seems to have replaced these types of pages – they used to be very popular and easily accessible from home pages, generally via a small link in the footer or upper right of the site, but now are harder to find.
Conclusion
A variety of information architecture techniques are employed to help make content easily accessible for users. Everything from small visual and contextual cues, to items being categorised in footers, site map pages and menus and search suggestions based on frequently asked questions (or commonly-searched terms) is critical in helping consumers find information that can potentially change their financial situation and make critically important decisions.
References
Nielsen, J. and Li, A. (2017). Mega Menus Work Well for Site Navigation. [online] Nielsen Norman Group. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/mega-menus-work-well/ [Accessed 19 Oct. 2018].
Ui-patterns.com. (n.d.). Fat Footer design pattern. [online] Available at: http://ui-patterns.com/patterns/FatFooter [Accessed 19 Oct. 2018].
Uxbooth.com. (2015). Fat Footer Roundup | UX Booth. [online] Available at: http://www.uxbooth.com/articles/fat-footer-roundup/ [Accessed 19 Oct. 2018].
Webpagemistakes.ca. (2011). Should I Create a Sitemap or HTML Site Map?. [online] Available at: http://www.webpagemistakes.ca/create-sitemap-or-html-site-map/ [Accessed 19 Oct. 2018].
1 Comment on “Information architecture of navigation on financial websites”
Comments are closed.